Blog

Economic growth and payrolls: The old ball and chain

Strong payrolls can’t fix slow growth.

Lara Rhame
May 5, 2017 | 4 minute read

Payrolls rose 211,000 in April, recovering from the big downside surprise in March of only 79,000 new jobs. Strong payrolls have helped fuel investors’ expectations for future U.S. growth, and that sentiment is well reflected in rising equity markets. We believe investors would be wise to take a more grounded view and recognize that the economy can only grow as fast as labor force growth and productivity allow. As investors’ growth expectations rise, we believe payrolls will likely function more like a ball and chain than a catalyst for growth.

High hopes and strong payrolls

Expectations about the economy have improved markedly in the first quarter of 2017, and strong payrolls have been playing their part. This optimism is apparent in a wide variety of indicators. For example, consumer and business sentiment indicators have risen significantly in the first quarter, with several indexes at or near decade highs.¹

But against the backdrop of confidence in future growth, we believe markets have started taking strong payroll gains for granted. During this expansion, we have seen the longest stretch of uninterrupted payroll increases since the Bureau of Labor Statistics began tracking the data in 1939. Moreover, job gains have been steady and strong, with the 12-month average hovering between 180,000 and 220,000 for five years.²

Yet the current pace of payroll gains will be difficult to maintain. Adding more than 16 million jobs² since the recession ended has pulled the unemployment rate down from 10.0% in 2009 to 4.4% in April.³ That is below the Fed’s estimate of full employment⁴ and indicates that the labor market will soon run low on unemployed people to pull into the labor force.

So it really isn’t the market’s fault. When you have been lulled into thinking anything below 180,000 is a downside surprise, it is easy to forget that official estimates of “trend” payroll gains are closer to 75,000.⁵

Growth is all about payrolls

More so now than at any other time since the 1970s, growth in our economy is directly linked to growth in employment. The two strongly trend together, as can be seen in the chart below, with employment rising and falling with the business cycle (albeit with a lag). Historically, the economy typically grows at a faster rate than employment gains. During the expansion in the 1990s, GDP averaged 3.5% while employment growth averaged 1.9%. In the expansion during the 2000s, GDP averaged 2.6% while employment growth averaged 0.7%. However, over the last five years GDP growth of 2.1% has barely outpaced employment growth at 1.8%.⁶

Strongly linked: Growth of GDP and payrolls year over year

Sources: Bureau of Economic Analysis, FS Investments.

What’s changed? The big difference today is that productivity growth is close to zero in our economy. Productivity peaked in 2004 and has been on a downtrend ever since, averaging only 0.6% over the past five years.

Growth in productivity – each individual worker creating more output – is critical because without it, more growth is entirely dependent upon more workers. Put another way, the upside to growth is limited by the pool of available labor, which was deep right after the recession ended, but with every strong payrolls report is rapidly becoming shallower.

Moderating payrolls could stifle growth expectations

Positive growth expectations have raised hopes that businesses may increase investment spending and that infrastructure spending could further boost output. But after years of strong employment gains, the unemployment rate is already signaling that additional labor may be hard, and more expensive, to find.

The link between economic growth and job growth is strong. Without productivity growth, the link turns into the proverbial ball and chain, where scarce labor resources could stifle growth. But if payroll gains moderate over the coming year, as we expect they will, we could see markets face a painful adjustment as potential growth remains constrained at current low levels.

Watch

What low economic growth means for 2017

  • The Conference Board’s consumer confidence measure hit a 15-year high in March, and purchasing managers indexes have all been at multiyear highs, including the Philly Fed index, which hit a 33-year high in February.

  • Bureau of Labor Statistics, FS Investments.

  • Bureau of Labor Statistics.

  • In its most recent economic projections, the Fed estimates long-run unemployment as 4.7%. Economic Projections of Federal Reserve Board members and Federal Reserve Bank presidents, March 2017.

  • “Trend Job Growth: Where’s Normal?” FRBSF Economic Letter, October 24, 2016.

  • Bureau of Economic Analysis, FS Investments.

This information is educational in nature and does not constitute a financial promotion, investment advice or an inducement or incitement to participate in any product, offering or investment. FS Investments is not adopting, making a recommendation for or endorsing any investment strategy or particular security. All views, opinions and positions expressed herein are that of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions or positions of FS Investments. All opinions are subject to change without notice, and you should always obtain current information and perform due diligence before participating in any investment. FS Investments does not provide legal or tax advice and the information herein should not be considered legal or tax advice. Tax laws and regulations are complex and subject to change, which can materially impact any investment result. FS Investments cannot guarantee that the information herein is accurate, complete, or timely. FS Investments makes no warranties with regard to such information or results obtained by its use, and disclaims any liability arising out of your use of, or any tax position taken in reliance on, such information.

Any projections, forecasts and estimates contained herein are based upon certain assumptions that the author considers reasonable. Projections are necessarily speculative in nature, and it can be expected that some or all of the assumptions underlying the projections will not materialize or will vary significantly from actual results. The inclusion of projections herein should not be regarded as a representation or guarantee regarding the reliability, accuracy or completeness of the information contained herein, and neither FS Investments nor the author are under any obligation to update or keep current such information.

All investing is subject to risk, including the possible loss of the money you invest.

Lara Rhame

Chief U.S. Economist + Managing Director

Search our site